Side View BMW X3 (G01) SUV 2017 vs. Mazda MX-5 (ND) Roadster 2015 Technical specs | BMW X3 (G01) SUV 2017 is 79.3 cm longer and 45.1 cm higher compared to Mazda MX-5 (ND) Roadster 2015. It has 6.9 cm more ground clearance and offers 1131% more cargo space. 4,5
Showing nationwide pricing. Enter your zip code to view local pricing. 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD CarGurus Instant Market Value $35,615 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD CarGurus Instant Market Value $15,427 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD No Expert Reviews 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD Fans of the BMW Z3 are likely to argue that the company's last version, produced in 2002, was its best. Six years of "consistent and conscientious development" and wider acceptance of ... 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD No User Reviews 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD Jonathan writes: Fun, as manual a driver does not feel the thrill because of how much weight the car is. Seeing the hood is a n... Looks/Style Ranked 2001 Audi TT quattro Roadster AWD better. "I think the TT has a better look because of its retro style and go kart vibe." Would Buy Ranked 2001 Audi TT quattro Roadster AWD better. "I would buy an Audi TT instead because of the horsepower and interior feel." VWJett writes: Good driving car Front Seats Ranked 2006 Volkswagen Beetle Convertible worse. "Front seats were more better " Cargo Capacity Ranked 2006 Volkswagen Beetle Convertible better. "The VW Beetle has biggest trunk ever " 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD Powertrain 6-Speed Manual Drivetrain RWD RWD RWD Fuel Economy, City 26 MPG 17 MPG 18 MPG Fuel Economy, Highway 34 MPG 24 MPG 25 MPG Fuel Tank Volume gal 13 gal Engine Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline Gasoline Power 181 hp @ 7,000 RPM 184 hp @ 6,000 RPM 184 hp @ 6,000 RPM Torque 151 lb-ft @ 4,000 RPM 175 lb-ft @ 3,500 RPM 175 lb-ft @ 3,500 RPM Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders Compression Ratio 13:1 -- -- Displacement 2,000 cc 2,500 cc 2,500 cc Bore x Stroke in x in -- -- Safety ABS Brakes Standard Standard Driver Airbag Standard Standard Passenger Airbag Standard Standard Front Side Airbags Standard Standard NHTSA Crash Test Results Comfort and Convenience Leather Seats -- Optional Air Conditioning Standard Standard CD Player -- Standard CD Changer -- Optional Cassette Player -- Optional Radio Standard Standard Power Windows Standard Standard Power Door Locks Standard Standard Driver Power Seats -- Standard Passenger Power Seats -- Standard Interior Maximum Seating 2 seats 2 seats Front Legroom in in Back Legroom -- -- Payload and Towing Cargo Volume cu ft 5 cu ft Maximum Payload 404 lbs -- Exterior Length in in Width in in Height in in Wheelbase in in 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD Exterior Colors Deep Crystal Blue Mica Jet Black Mica Machine Gray Metallic POLYMETAL Gray Metallic Platinum Quartz Metallic Snowflake White Pearl Mica Soul Red Crystal Metallic Option Packages Appearance Package BREMBO/BBS RECARO Package Soul Red Crystal Paint Charge Machine Gray Metallic Paint Charge 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8, 1997) Previous Next 1 of 3. BMW USA. BMW USA None are better than the Mazda MX-5 Miata. Now in its fourth generation, it continues to deliver a blend of fun and value in Killer2005 Original Poster 18,515 posts 207 months Saturday 15th January 2011 I have been thinking about my next car, and have been thinking that I need a RWD sports car for about 4-5k. There was an option of going slightly over my budget for something along the lines of a Caterham or a Honda S2000, but lack of suitable storage places and insurance prices have put these ideas to bed, so its down to the Z3 vs more interestingly, I'm leaning more towards the Z3 than the MX5. Largely due to the fact that my commute at the moment is nearly all dual carriageway or motorway, and I really don't get enough time on twisties So sensible thinking or has insanity finally taken over me? Saturday 15th January 2011 S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chap Saturday 15th January 2011 The MX5 is the better sports car, but the Z3 (assuming you're talking about an I6) may well be the better GT. Neither is really designed for motorways. Saturday 15th January 2011 S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chap Saturday 15th January 2011 wackojacko said: S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chapNot too bad on the motorway, VERY good MPG compared to the MX5 and Z3. MR2 Spyder is arguably a better drive (certainly more of a sports car in terms of handling than the Z3) although a front engined RWD is more progressive and easier to have 'leet drift fun' with than a 'midship runabout'.Where it falls down is a complete lack of storage space compared to just about every other cabriolet (and in my humble opinion that is really the only insurmountable negative point). That said, I am not sure if a rear luggage rack is as it is a mid(engined)-ship, the cabin is quite big compared to an MX5 (relatively speaking) and there is usable space in the passenger footwell. There is a bit of space in the front boot and behind the seats too, but no rear 'boot' like a Mk2 MR2 or boxster by texasjohn on Saturday 15th January 20:46 Saturday 15th January 2011 Saturday 15th January 2011 Definitely or Z3. Brilliant cars and for 5k you can find a good one of either. I've sold my Z3 six months ago for It needed is absolutely nothing wrong with Z3 on a motorway. One thing - wind deflector is a must if you are thinking of roofless m/way you want it quieter with roof up you can buy an optional engine in is very nice to drive in town too, plenty of torque at low revs. redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarOh really? And then a slower than the slow thing, tiny engined, with a pathetic soundtrack from its mere 4 cylinders MX-5 is? Edited by rottie102 on Saturday 15th January 20:57 Saturday 15th January 2011 redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarFair comment. It's not that bad a cruiser with the I-6 though. Saturday 15th January 2011 rottie102 said: redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarOh really? And then a slower than the slow thing, tiny engined, with a pathetic soundtrack from its mere 4 cylinders MX-5 is? Um, yes. Saturday 15th January 2011 rottie102 said: redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarOh really? And then a slower than the slow thing, tiny engined, with a pathetic soundtrack from its mere 4 cylinders MX-5 is? Yes. A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an Unless the MG has a by JFReturns on Saturday 15th January 21:09 Saturday 15th January 2011 JFReturns said: A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an MGTF is a vastly better drivers car than the Z3. Saturday 15th January 2011 I had a weekend in a Z3 when looking to upgrade the MX5. No way is it a sportscar. It was neither confidence inspiring, that quick, or fun. I bought a Chimaera. Saturday 15th January 2011 A 2 seater sportscar isn't what you want for a commute in my opinion, something bigger, more comfortable and wafty would be more suited.. I'm sure, though, that you have already considered Z3 is the worst of both worlds, it's neither as fun as an MX-5 nor as comfortable as a mondeo or other motorway muncher. A Z3 is likely to cost you a lot more than an MX-5 or a mondeo in running money would go on a mk MX-5 with a hard top (and leather if possible, but the hard top would be more of a priority). Saturday 15th January 2011 kambites said: JFReturns said: A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an MGTF is a vastly better drivers car than the Z3. Agreed. But then so is Panda. Saturday 15th January 2011 texasjohn said: wackojacko said: S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chapNot too bad on the motorway, VERY good MPG compared to the MX5 and Z3. MR2 Spyder is arguably a better drive (certainly more of a sports car in terms of handling than the Z3) although a front engined RWD is more progressive and easier to have 'leet drift fun' with than a 'midship runabout'.Where it falls down is a complete lack of storage space compared to just about every other cabriolet (and in my humble opinion that is really the only insurmountable negative point). That said, I am not sure if a rear luggage rack is as it is a mid(engined)-ship, the cabin is quite big compared to an MX5 (relatively speaking) and there is usable space in the passenger footwell. There is a bit of space in the front boot and behind the seats too, but no rear 'boot' like a Mk2 MR2 or boxster by texasjohn on Saturday 15th January 20:46 totally agree, storage space is rather agree with mid engined car 'snapping' faster but the MRS was very gradual when provoked, it can be had fun with when more experienced but i found the MRS is set up to understeer before it's near to snapping so unless you play with it, it shouldn't turn on arguably more civilised, air con , leather etc and a hard top option (also with mx-5) Saturday 15th January 2011 I'm about to get a Z3 for exactly that purpose - i have a 40 mile m-way commute, and want something small, ragtop with some torque to it. I built my MR2 for a previous, shorter commute and weekend fun and its just too thirsty, loud and gizmo-filled for what i want the Z3, see if you like it. Saturday 15th January 2011 Saturday 15th January 2011 JFReturns said: kambites said: JFReturns said: A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an MGTF is a vastly better drivers car than the Z3. Agreed. But then so is don't share any more wisdom with us... Saturday 15th January 2011 Killer2005 said: Caterham , but lack of suitable storage places and insurance prices have put these ideas to on Caterhams is dead cheap for the speed of the things. It'll be cheaper than the S2000, Z3, MX5 etc... I'd be willing to you get quotes again, don't make the mistake of getting quotes through a normal insurance company which you would use to get quotes for most the other more standard a kit car specialist such as Adrian Flux, Caterham insurance, MSM insurance (personal vote for them) and many more. Due to being a kit car (factory built or built by yourself), it's cheaper to normal cars in the same way classic insurance is insurance it's self is the same. I have mine insured for 10K miles per year (could be unlimited) as I use it as my daily and only car, living outside in a communal car park for flats and houses. 3rd party insurance to drive other cars, free windscreen cover or a limited amount of track day cover free over the year. Anyway, get a quote through one of the above mentioned people and see how it comes out. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. Killer2005 Original Poster 18,515 posts 207 months Saturday 15th January 2011 Its the lack of useful places for a Caterham to live thats putting that idea off. Where I live now I could quite happily do it as its quite out of the way, but where I would be moving to I would'nt want to keep a caterham as it would be on street parking, and not the better places in Leeds to be keeping one is local and I'm really quite temped but I would forsee the worst happening Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff Posting Rules Mazda MX-5 Miata 1996 Workshop Manual 1996 Mazda Motor Corporation Mazda MX-5 Miata 2007-02 Brian Long This text presents the full, illustrated history of the car that reinvented the traditional sportscar and has enjoyed huge sales success and critical acclaim throughout the world. Road & Track Mazda MX-5 Miata 1989-2002 Portfolio 2003-01-10 R News Original Z4 plummets to old MX-5 pricing 20 Jul 2017 Buying new, the Mazda MX-5 is the world’s best-value when purchasing a used rear-drive drop-top, a relatively unloved and unlikely contender has arguably taken the title – from the era of Chris Bangle and made in the USA, enter the original BMW the undercooked (albeit James Bond Goldeneye-cool) BMW Z3 roadster that was meant to challenge the original Porsche Boxster in the late 1990s, the Z4 made a far better fist of things. There are two models worthy of note, and both are now stellar the classifieds first, however, and note that the NA-generation MX-5 is still commanding big money for a decades-old car. Original 1989 examples are fetching over $5000 while the last-of-the-line (and sought-after) 1996 can see $10, the NB-gen that followed, particularly in 2004 SE Turbo guise, stretches from $12,000 to $20,000 depending on the kilometre reading. These Japanese roadsters are as great to drive as they are easy to work on and endlessly reliable, but there’s a big ‘but’ under $15,000 a decade-old BMW Z4 roadster can be purchased with around 100,000km showing (or similar kays to the equivalent Mazda). The Z4 cost $92,000 plus on-road costs brand new, and it came equipped with a straight six-cylinder producing 170kW at 5900rpm and 300Nm at 3500rpm, with a six-speed manual good for a standstill to 100km/h sprint time of around this to the 126kW/206Nm in an MX-5 SE Z4 with a Dodge Viper V10 engineUnderpinned by an E46 3 Series chassis, it was no duffer in the handling department, either. That said, it lacked an LSD and this was round one of BMW’s foray into electric power steering, which wasn’t a high point of the car. No, the Z4 wasn’t quite Boxster-good – but it simply isn’t possible to buy the Porsche for this money on the used-car is a second contender for best-value roadster honours as well – the BMW Z4 M. For around $30,000 it makes an E46 M3 of the era seem pricey, and it could surely tempt some away from that petite new ND-gen MX-5 base E46 M3-derived S54 straight six (with 252kW at a soaring 7900rpm and 365Nm at 4900rpm) placed the LSD-equipped chassis to great use. The manual-equipped sprint to triple-figure speed was covered in around – which is still brisk by today’s standards. Hard-top versions of the Z4 M will of course ask more than the roadster, in the same way that (at least for now) a Cayman will ask more from your wallet than a Boxster just look at the long bonnet and epic dash-to-axle ratio of the first BMW Z4, with driver’s bum on the axle and short rear overhang, then tell us you’d rather a Mazda MX-5. COMMENTS
The Mazda MX-5 (NB) is the second generation of the Mazda MX-5 manufactured from 1998 until 2005. The model continued the MX-5's philosophy of being a lightweight, front mid-engine, rear-wheel-drive roadster while featuring numerous performance improvements, however lacking its predecessor's retractable headlamps.
Mazda MX-5 jest bezkonkurencyjna. W swojej 26-letniej historii nie doczekała się godnego siebie bezpośredniego rywala. Jednak ten zaszczytny status nie chroni małego roadstera przed porównaniami. Na upartego zawsze można dobrać konkurenta. W kwietniu („AŚ” nr 17/18) zestawiliśmy 1,5-litrowe MX-5 z Mini Cooperem cabrio. To starcie brytyjskie kabrio wygrał 10 punktami. Teraz MX-5 dostaje drugą szansę w mocniejszej wersji z silnikiem Jednak tym razem musi się zmierzyć z BMW Z4. Oczywiście, te dwa auta dzieli duża różnica w cenie, za to łączy je idea dawania kierowcy czystej radości z jazdy, którą zapewnia mieszanka otwieranego dachu z: niską masą auta i jej korzystnym rozkładem między osiami, tylnym napędem, precyzyjnym prowadzeniem i nadwyżką mocy. BMW Z4 jest oferowane w 3. generacji od 2009 r. – to obecnie najstarszy model w palecie bawarskiego producenta. Najsłabszy dostępny w nim silnik, oznaczony symbolem 18i (156 KM), świetnie pasowałby do tego porównania, ale... BMW, niestety, nie mogło nam udostępnić takiego auta do testu. Zamiast niego dostaliśmy 184-konną wersję 20i, która kosztuje od 167 200 zł. MX-5 nigdy nie będzie tak drogie. 160-konna odmiana SKY-G i-ELOOP jest oferowana tylko we „wszystkomającej” wersji wyposażeniowej SkyFreedom (113 900 zł). Skórzana tapicerka, automatyczna klimatyzacja, asystent pasa ruchu, nawigacja, nagłośnienie Bose – to wszystko znajdziecie seryjnie w MX-5, natomiast w Z4 wymaga dużych dopłat albo (jak np. asystent pasa ruchu) w ogóle nie jest dostępne. Mazda MX-5 z pełnym wyposażeniem Bogate wyposażenie czyni codzienne użytkowanie auta bardziej komfortowym, ale przecież nie po to kupuje się roadstera. MX-5 nie zatraciło surowego charakteru. Dach otwiera, a właściwie „odrzuca się” ręcznie, bowiem po zwolnieniu blokady wystarczy machnąć ręką za siebie i już można cieszyć się wiatrem we włosach, dać się pochłonąć prowadzeniu, wciągnąć w zwinne skręcanie, szybkie zmienianie biegów krótkim lewarkiem i wysokie kręcenie silnika... Sami chyba rozumiecie, dlaczego elektryczny napęd mechanizmu składania dachu nie jest dostępny. MX-5 „żyje” i zaraża swoją żywiołowością kierowcę. Zmierzona przez nas masa 1070 kg (mówimy tu o aucie z kompletnym wyposażeniem) trafia na moc 160 koni zakochanych w wysokich obrotach, czekających tylko na to, by wierzgnąć kopytami na szczycie ciasnego zakrętu. ESP dopuszcza drobne zamiatanie tyłem, zanim wkroczy do akcji. Rozczulająco ryczący 2-litrowy „wolny ssak” wkręca się na obroty tak, jakby był w transie, a krótki, wręcz dżojstikowy lewarek skacze między przełożeniami z precyzją i właściwym oporem. Ręka bardziej z nim wykonuje perfekcyjnie wyćwiczony układ taneczny, niż zmienia biegi. Choreografem pozostaje jednak układ kierowniczy, mający kierowcy naprawdę mnóstwo do powiedzenia i tak samo dobrze przekazujący jego polecenia do kół. Zakręty bierze się „na raz”, bez poprawiania kąta skrętu kierownicy. Jazdę czuć całym sobą, czuć pracę mechanizmów, czuć asfalt – to auto jest po prostu niczym przedłużenie kończyn. BMW Z4 to przy MX-5 inny świat Przesiadamy się do Z4 i lądujemy w innym świecie. Mościmy się w wygodnych fotelach z obszernymi siedziskami i dużym zakresem ustawień. Wykończenie jest na wysokim, wręcz luksusowym poziomie. Dach – sztywny i elektrycznie składany, a szyb bocznych naliczyliśmy 4, a nie 2, jak w MX-5. Z4 sprawia w środku nieco „limuzynowe” wrażenie, gdy jeszcze przed chwilą siedziało się w spartańskim, filigranowym MX-5. Silnik Z4 włącza się przyciskiem. Do dobrze wygłuszonej kabiny dyskretnie przedostaje się dość przypadkowe, typowo 4-cylindrowe brzmienie. Sprzęgło, „jedynka” – aha! – nie wchodzi tak lekko i aksamitnie, jak w Maździe. Dodajemy gazu, 270 Nm wciska plecy w fotel już od 1250 obrotów. Odpowiednio gwałtownie Z4 przyspiesza też od niskich obrotów. Jednak MX-5 nie robi się przy tym malutkie w lusterku wstecznym. Wręcz przeciwnie, przystępuje do wyprzedzania! Poza elastycznością 80-120 km/h na 6. biegu i prędkością maksymalną to właśnie Mazda może pochwalić się bardziej emocjonującymi osiągami. Asem w jej rękawie jest bowiem niska masa – Z4 jest aż o 428 kg cięższe i o 32 cm dłuższe od MX-5. Większy rozstaw osi BMW przekłada się na lepszą amortyzację nierówności, szczególnie gdy na pokładzie jest adaptacyjne zawieszenie. W komfortowym trybie Z4 sprawnie wygładza pofałdowania jezdni, dobrze radzi sobie także na kocich łbach. I nawet w sportowym ustawieniu BMW pozostaje miększe od Mazdy, która w tej wersji ma seryjne sportowe zawieszenie Bilsteina. Jednak to nie wada w tym aucie, bo nikt nie szuka komfortu w MX-5. Na co dzień Mazda jest twarda, ale jej zawieszenie filtruje najmocniejsze uderzenia. BMW chce być i komfortowe, i sportowe, podczas gdy Mazda skupia się na drugiej z tych dyscyplin. Spełnia minimum podstawowych potrzeb motoryzacyjnych, a daje maksimum przyjemności z jazdy. Czyli dotrzecie nią z punktu A do punktu B, a przy tym będziecie się świetnie bawić. Mazda MX-5 kontra BMW Z4 - punktacja Maks. punktów Mazda MX-5 BMW Z4 Przestronnośc i bagażnik 10 4 6 Jakość, wykończenie 10 7 9 Fotele i pozycja kierowcy 20 15 18 Wyposażenie (komfort) 10 8 9 Systemy bezpieczeństwa 20 13 11 Składanie dachu 10 7 8 Zryw (reakcja na dodanie gazu) 10 5 5 Przyspieszenie 20 17 16 Elastyczność 20 14 14 Skrzynia biegów 20 19 17 Dźwięk silnika 10 6 5 Komfort amortyzacji 10 4 7 Zachowanie na drodze 30 27 26 Układ kierowniczy 20 17 16 Skuteczność hamulców 30 23 17 Wizerunek 10 5 7 Zużycie paliwa 20 11 10 Cena 20 12 4 Wynik końcowy 300 214 205 Naszym zdaniem: wielki triumf Mazdy Mimo niższej mocy i braku turbo MX-5 rozprawiło się z ciężkim Z4. Mazda perfekcyjnie pokazuje ducha roadstera w klasycznym rozumieniu – angażuje w jazdę, rewelacyjnie się ją prowadzi i jednocześnie oferuje bardzo bogate wyposażenie w cenie aż o 100 000 zł niższej od Z4! Sorry, BMW... Mazda MX-5 kontra BMW Z4 - dane producenta Mazda MX-5 BMW Z4 Silnik: typ/cylindry/zawory benzynowy/R4/16 Pojemność skokowa 1998 cm3 1997 cm3 Moc maksymalna 160 KM/6000 obr./min. 184 KM/5000 obr./min. Maks. moment obrotowy 200 Nm/4600 obr./min. 270 Nm/1250 obr./min. Prędkość maksymalna 214 km/h 235 km/h Skrzynia biegów ręczna 6b ręczna 6b Napęd tylny tylny Hamulce (przód/tył) tw/t tw/tw Pojemność bagażnika 130 l 180-310 l Rozmiar opon 205/45 R17 225/45 R17 | 255/40 R17 Pojemnośc zbiornika paliwa 45 l 55 l Spalanie fabr. miasto/trasa/średnie 8,7/5,4/6,6 l/100 km 8,9/5,6/6,8 l/100 km Długość/szerokość/wysokość 3915/1735/1230 mm 4239/1790/1291 mm Mazda MX-5 kontra BMW Z4 - wyniki testów Mazda MX-5 BMW Z4 Przyspieszenie 0-50 km/h 2,3 s 2,5 s Przyspieszenie 0-100 km/h 7,0 s 7,6 s Przyspieszenie 0-130/0-160 km/h 11,4/17,5 s 12,2/19,1 s Elastyczność 60-100 km/h 5,9/8,1 s (na 4./.5 biegu) 6,4/8,7 s (na 4./5. biegu) Elastyczność 80-120 km/h 8,0/11,9 s(na 5. i 6. biegu) 8,8/11,4 s (na 5. i 6. biegu) Masa rzeczywista/ładowność 1070/190 kg 1498/227 kg Rozdział masy (przód/tył) 53/47 proc. 47/53 proc. Średnica zawr. (w lewo/w prawo) 10,1/10, 4 m 10,7/10,8 m Hamowanie ze 100 km/h (zimne) 34,6 m 37,4 m Hamowanie ze 100 km/h (gorące) 35,6 m 36,7 m Hałas w kabinie przy 50 km/h 64 dB 62 dB Hałas w kabinie przy 100 km/h 75 dB 69 dB Hałas w kabinie przy 130 km/h 79 dB 72 dB Spalanie testowe 7,0 l/100 km 7,7 l/100 km Zasięg 630 km 710 km Mazda MX-5 kontra BMW Z4 - gwarancja/ceny Mazda MX-5 BMW Z4 Cena podstawowa testowanej wersji 113 900 zł 167 200 zł Utrata wartości (po 3 latach i 45 tys. km) 48,3 proc. 48,6 proc. Gwarancja mechaniczna 3 lata/100 tys. km 2 lata/bez limitu km Gwarancja perforacyjna 12 lat 12 lat Przeglądy okresowe co 20 tys. km lub rok wg. wskazań lub co 2 lata Cena po doposażeniu 113 900 zł 212 349 zł
Compare the 2023 Mazda CX-5 with the 2023 Mazda CX-50: car rankings, scores, prices and specs. Make Acura Alfa Romeo Aston Martin Audi BMW Buick Cadillac Chevrolet Chrysler Dodge Ferrari FIAT Ford Genesis GMC Honda HUMMER Hyundai Infiniti Isuzu Jaguar Jeep Kia Lamborghini Land Rover Lexus Lincoln Lotus Maserati Mazda Mercedes-Benz Mercury MINI
Pa ?e to... Kak?na je po va?em mnenju realna cena za enga solidnega 2001/2002 letnika (neke srednje mo?i)?Lep pozdrav, da ?e jest mal lon?ek pristavim.. Najprej bom omenil, da o Z3 ne vem kaj dosti, nisem ga ?e peljal, tko da ne bom sodil o tem. Kar je blo pa zgoraj napisanega o primerjavah obeh, kar dr?i. ?e se najprej obregnem ob citat, mx-5 je od 2002 letnika faceliftana, kar pomeni, da ima lep?e prednje in zadnje lu?i, prednji odbija? in nekaj malega notranjosti. Na si lahko pogleda? razlike do 01 letnika in od 02 naprej. Praviloma je facelift kak?nega jur?ka dra?ji, ?e ti to igra kaj vloge..Sicer je pa avto fantasti?en, vzdr?evanje poceni, vozne lastnosti odli?ne, veter v laseh in ob?utek brez?asnosti...na ra?un luksuza in prostornosti..se spla?a. Sam sicer vozim razli?ico z 81kw motorjem in mi na splo?no ?ist ustreza, ob bolj dirka?ki vo?nji pa manjka mo?i, sploh pri ovinkih in prehitevanjih. Takrat je treba ve?krat menjat prestave in priganjat v visoke obrate..btw..zvok motorja je zelo lep sicer pa zado??a, povpre?na poraba na 17colkah je okrog ?isto nakupu mx-5 nima? kej dost pazit, tako kot pri navadnem avtu. Razen platnene strehe pazi, ta mora bit lepo ohranjena, ni? razpokana in da se gladko odpira in zapira. Hardtop dobi? pri nas za okoli 500eur, preko E-baya ?e ceneje. Pozimi zelo prav pride, sploh ?e ma? avto parkiran zunaj. v tej temi pi?e tudi nekaj na to temo, si lahko pogleda?..

BMW Z3 vs Mazda MX-5: compare price, expert/user reviews, mpg, engines, safety, luggage capacity and other specs. Compare against other cars.

Return to top What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the BMW Z4 BMW Z4 Reliability And Durability: Pros YearBody/PowertrainComment 2007 2dr Hatch 255-horsepower I66-speed manual RWD Certified pre-owned. full 2007 BMW Z4 review 2006 2dr Convertible 215-horsepower I66-speed manual RWD It has a reputation with consumer organizations for very reliable performance - a real plus when repairs on such cars are so expensive. The "certified" warranty was important to me with this in mind. full 2006 BMW Z4 review 2006 2dr Convertible 215-horsepower I66-speed manual RWD The car has the remaining new car warranty and maintenance. It is CPO to 6yr-100k miles. full 2006 BMW Z4 review BMW Z4 Reliability And Durability: Cons YearBody/PowertrainComment 2003 2dr Convertible 184-horsepower I65-speed manual RWD Parts( fuel pump) that would nearly outlast any domestic or foreign car make failed after only 25,000 miles. Dealer attempted to charge me nearly $2000 to replace same...said "No thanks," and took to independent garage who charged 1/3 to repair. full 2003 BMW Z4 review What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the BMW Z4 BMW Z4 Reliability And Durability: Pros YearBody/PowertrainComment 2007 2dr Hatch 255-horsepower I66-speed manual RWD Certified pre-owned. full 2007 BMW Z4 review 2006 2dr Convertible 215-horsepower I66-speed manual RWD It has a reputation with consumer organizations for very reliable performance - a real plus when repairs on such cars are so expensive. The "certified" warranty was important to me with this in mind. full 2006 BMW Z4 review 2006 2dr Convertible 215-horsepower I66-speed manual RWD The car has the remaining new car warranty and maintenance. It is CPO to 6yr-100k miles. full 2006 BMW Z4 review BMW Z4 Reliability And Durability: Cons YearBody/PowertrainComment 2003 2dr Convertible 184-horsepower I65-speed manual RWD Parts( fuel pump) that would nearly outlast any domestic or foreign car make failed after only 25,000 miles. Dealer attempted to charge me nearly $2000 to replace same...said "No thanks," and took to independent garage who charged 1/3 to repair. full 2003 BMW Z4 review 0Jgf. 313 134 225 368 16 488 20 475 7

bmw z3 vs mazda mx 5